Send My Request
How to specify dimensions and fits for nylon bushings?
- 1. How do I account for nylon's hygroscopic swelling and thermal expansion when specifying shaft-to-bushing clearance for humid or temperature-cycling environments?
- 2. What interference/press-fit tolerance should I specify to retain a nylon bushing in an aluminum housing without causing cracking or creep?
- 3. How should I specify shaft surface finish, hardness and diameter tolerance for long-life dry-running nylon bushings?
- 4. How do I convert a metal-bushing specification to an equivalent nylon bushing for retrofitting existing assemblies?
- 5. For thin-walled or long-length molded nylon bushings, how should I specify wall thickness, unsupported span and reinforcements to avoid extrusion and premature wear?
- 6. How should I specify material grade (PA6 vs PA66, glass-filled, PTFE- or graphite-filled) and temperature limits if the application runs intermittently up to 120°C?
- Concluding summary
How to Specify Dimensions and Fits for Nylon Bushing: Practical Guide for Engineers
When selecting and specifying nylon bushings (self-lubricating nylon bushings, injection-molded plastic bearings) for industrial designs you must consider material, dimensional tolerances, clearances, installation method, operating environment and shaft surface condition. The six long-tail, pain-point questions below address advanced, practical issues that are often answered superficially online. Each answer gives a structured method you can apply to create robust specifications and reduce field failures.
1. How do I account for nylon's hygroscopic swelling and thermal expansion when specifying shaft-to-bushing clearance for humid or temperature-cycling environments?
Problem: Nylon (PA6/PA66) absorbs moisture and has a much higher coefficient of thermal expansion than metals. Both effects change bushing internal diameter (ID) in service and can turn an initially tight fit into interference (or vice versa), causing binding, increased wear or extrusion.
Practical approach:
- Use material datasheets: Obtain the supplier datasheet for the exact compound (unfilled, glass-filled, PTFE- or graphite-filled). Key properties: coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CLTE), hygroscopic swelling characteristics and dimensional stability under moisture.
- Define worst-case conditions: Specify the maximum expected temperature range and relative humidity (or immersed condition). Use those conditions to predict dimensional change rather than ambient shop conditions.
- Calculate dimensional change: Estimate ID change from CLTE and expected ΔT. Then add expected hygroscopic swelling from supplier test data for the specified humidity or immersion. If supplier data is unavailable, require a conditioned-test sample as a drawing note.
- Set target running clearance: Decide on the running clearance needed for the application (sliding, oscillation, rotational, intermittent). For low-speed rotary or oscillating bushings you generally need a positive clearance at the hottest/wettest condition to avoid seizure.
- Specify initial nominal clearance: Work backwards—choose the nominal (dry, room-temperature) ID that leaves the required running clearance at the worst-case condition after swelling and thermal expansion. Add acceptance limits to the drawing referencing the material and test-conditioning state.
Example (process, not a universal number): If your running clearance target at max temperature/humidity is 0.05 mm, and predicted shrink/expansion shows the ID will change by +0.03 mm in that environment, specify an initial nominal clearance of 0.08 mm at 23°C dry prior to installation. Always validate with prototyping and conditioned samples.
Design tips:
- Choose glass-filled nylon if dimensional stability is critical—fillers reduce hygroscopic swelling and CLTE.
- Where moisture cannot be controlled, specify a non-hygroscopic alternative (POM, PTFE-filled compounds) or add controlled seals to isolate the bearing from process fluids.
- Include a drawing note: “All dimensions assume material conditioned to X% RH per supplier datasheet—final ID verified on production samples after conditioning.”
2. What interference/press-fit tolerance should I specify to retain a nylon bushing in an aluminum housing without causing cracking or creep?
Problem: Excessive interference when press-fitting a rigid polymer into metal can induce stress, leading to long-term creep, distortion, cracking or immediate installation problems.
Practical approach:
- Use ISO fit concepts: Specify housing bore tolerance as an ISO hole class (commonly H7) and the bushing outer diameter (OD) tolerance relative to that hole class. This keeps the drawing standardized and machinist-friendly.
- Prefer light interference or transition fits: Because polymer bushings are compliant, design for low interference or a light press rather than heavy metal-style interference. The exact interference magnitude depends on bushing geometry, wall thickness and operating loads—ask the bushing supplier to recommend a mounting interference for the compound used.
- Manage installation stresses: Consider thermal shrink-fit installation (cool the bushing in dry ice or liquid nitrogen) or warm the housing to reduce mechanical insertion force. Use chamfers, split bushing designs or a retaining feature (snap groove, retaining ring) to reduce radial stress concentrations.
- Use fillets and backing: Ensure housing shoulders are supportive and do not create point loads on the polymer. Avoid thin unsupported walls in the bushing. If possible, back the polymer with a metallic sleeve or thicker boss to limit deformation.
Specification language example (adapt and confirm with supplier): “Housing bore H7. Bushing OD nominal xx.x mm with tolerance +0.00 / +0.03 mm (press-fit per supplier installation instructions). Do not exceed supplier-recommended radial interference—final acceptance includes push-out force test of X N (per supplier).”
Notes:
- Always prototype installation to measure insertion force and verify no cracking. Conduct accelerated thermal cycling to detect creep-related loosening.
- If long-term radial loads are high, prefer a mechanical retention feature rather than relying on interference alone.
3. How should I specify shaft surface finish, hardness and diameter tolerance for long-life dry-running nylon bushings?
Problem: Mismatched shaft surface quality or softness accelerates polymer wear, raises friction and shortens bushing life. Many sources provide generic guidance but lack concrete inspection limits needed on drawings.
Practical approach:
- Surface roughness (finish): Specify a surface finish target such as Ra 0.2–0.8 µm for sliding shafts contacting plastic bearings. In many dry-running applications a finish of Ra 0.2–0.6 µm provides optimal running-in without gouging the polymer; rougher shafts can embed abrasive contaminants and increase wear.
- Shaft hardness: Call for a hard, wear-resistant shaft surface. Typical guidance is to use hardened, ground or chrome-plated shafts rather than soft, as-rolled steel. If heat-treated, specify surface hardness or case hardness rather than an unbounded callout (e.g., 58–62 HRC for case-hardened shafts; discuss exact requirement with bushing supplier).
- Diameter tolerance: Use ISO shaft tolerance classes consistent with the required running clearance once polymer behavior is considered. For rotating bushings that require precise clearance, choose tight shaft tolerances (e.g., h6) and combine with the calculated polymer ID considering temperature and moisture. For oscillating or forgiving applications, a looser tolerance (h9/h11) may be acceptable.
- Surface treatment: Avoid plating types that can flake (poor-quality plating) or surfaces with lubricants that attract dirt. Chrome plating or nitriding with a ground finish are common options to improve life.
Test and validate: Specify an initial run test (e.g., X hours at operating load/speed in conditioned humidity) to verify wear rates. Require supplier PV (pressure-velocity) guidance for the exact compound; ensure operating conditions are within the recommended PV envelope. Include acceptance criteria for shaft runout and concentricity as these affect local contact stresses.
4. How do I convert a metal-bushing specification to an equivalent nylon bushing for retrofitting existing assemblies?
Problem: Designers often replace bronze or bronze-lined bushings with nylon bushings to reduce noise, weight or maintenance. A straight swap using identical dimensions frequently fails because polymer clearances and supports differ from metal.
Conversion checklist:
- Review function and loads: Confirm duty (rotational/oscillation), radial and axial loads, speeds, shock loads and environment (moisture, chemicals, temperature). Compare to polymer material limits and PV values.
- Recalculate required clearance: Polymer-to-shaft clearances typically must be larger than metal-to-shaft clearances because polymers deform and change dimension with temperature and humidity. Use the method in Q1 to predict service clearance and set nominal ID accordingly.
- Check housing support: Metal bushings are often thinner and supported differently. Ensure the housing boss for the polymer bushing provides sufficient support area and fillets to prevent extrusion or deformation under load.
- Surface and shaft: Upgrade shaft finish and hardness if necessary as polymer bushings are more sensitive to shaft quality than metal bushings are in many cases.
- Include a break-in strategy: Nylon bushings may require a running-in period; specify initial torque/run-in procedure if appropriate and acceptance criteria for wear after break-in.
Documentation: Put explicit notes on the drawing: material grade (e.g., PA66 + 15% glass + solid lubricant), conditioned acceptance dimensions and expected running clearance at X°C/X%RH. Prototype the retrofit and test to life-cycle targets prior to full conversion.
5. For thin-walled or long-length molded nylon bushings, how should I specify wall thickness, unsupported span and reinforcements to avoid extrusion and premature wear?
Problem: Thin-walled injection molded bushings are cost-effective but can deform under radial load. Without adequate wall thickness and housing support, the polymer can extrude into gaps and wear quickly.
Design rules of thumb and specifications:
- Minimum wall thickness: Follow supplier tooling recommendations. As a rule, avoid extremely thin walls—many suppliers recommend a minimum local wall thickness to maintain structural integrity. If you must go thin, require a reinforcing insert or metallic backing.
- Supported length-to-diameter ratio: For high radial loads, increase the supported bearing length or split the load over multiple bushings. Avoid long unsupported spans; provide housing bosses along the length to prevent bulging.
- Include anti-extrusion features: Specify grooves, backup rings, or radial support lips in the housing. For applications with pressure differentials or high radial forces, detail a metal sleeve or thin-walled insert to back the polymer element.
- Tolerances and concentricity: Specify concentric housing bores and shoulders to prevent eccentric loading that magnifies local deformation. Use ISO tolerance callouts for bores (e.g., H7) and drawing notes for perpendicularity and runout control.
Testing requirement: Add a production test requirement that checks push-out force, radial deformation under a specified load and a short-term wear test representative of service. Many failures of thin bushings are manufacturing or installation related—add clear acceptance criteria to the drawing.
6. How should I specify material grade (PA6 vs PA66, glass-filled, PTFE- or graphite-filled) and temperature limits if the application runs intermittently up to 120°C?
Problem: On paper PA6 and PA66 look similar, but differences in crystallinity, glass transition and melting behavior plus the effect of fillers drastically affect service temperature, wear and dimensional stability.
Selection approach:
- Understand continuous vs. intermittent temperature ratings: Many unfilled nylons have continuous-use limits below 100°C; PA66 generally offers better high-temperature strength than PA6, but fillers and the exact polymer grade are decisive. Glass-fills improve dimensional stability and load capacity but reduce toughness and increase wear on mating shafts if abrasive.
- Use filled compounds for high temperature or high-load: For intermittent peaks to 120°C, select a material grade with proven performance at those temperatures—either a high-temp nylon grade or a filled variant. PTFE- or graphite-filled nylons provide lower friction and improved wear life for dry-running conditions.
- Request supplier thermal data: Ask for continuous service temperature, short-term peak capability, and mechanical property retention curves (tensile, flexural, creep) through the planned temperature range. Conditioning effects (moisture) should also be provided because high temperature combined with moisture affects properties differently than dry heat.
- Specify acceptance testing and post-molding stabilization: For high-temp parts, include a stabilization process or conditioning step in manufacturing control notes; require supplier-provided dimensional stability tests after thermal cycling covering expected service extremes.
Example drawing note: “Material: PA66 (specified compound XX) with 15% glass and PTFE solid lubricant; continuous service to 100°C, intermittent peaks to 120°C. Supplier to provide creep data and PV limits for the specified compound and certify parts after X thermal cycles.”
Concluding summary
Nylon bushings (self-lubricating nylon bushings, plastic bearings) offer advantages—low friction, corrosion resistance, low noise and maintenance-free operation—but they require careful specification because polymers behave differently than metals. Key advantages when properly specified:
- Self-lubrication and low friction for many dry-running applications
- Lightweight and corrosion-resistant compared with bronze
- Cost-effective molding for complex geometries and integrated features
- Options to tailor stiffness, wear and dimensional stability via fillers (glass, PTFE, graphite)
Best practice: specify the compound and conditioning state on the drawing, use ISO fit classes (e.g., H7 for bores) as a reference, calculate clearance for worst-case temperature/humidity, control shaft finish and hardness, and require prototype verification including thermal and humidity conditioning. Work with your bushing supplier to get compound-specific installation interference guidance and PV limits—and include those requirements in purchase documents.
Contact us for a quote and material-specific recommendations tailored to your application. Website: www.gz-bost.com • Email: postmaster@china-otem.com
Recommended for you
FAQ
FAQs
What is the minimum order quantity (MOQ)? Do you support small-batch trial production?
The MOQ for standard products is ≥100kg. We support small-batch trial production (as low as 20kg) and provide mold testing reports and performance data feedback.
How do I select the appropriate engineering plastic grade for my product?
Selection should be based on parameters such as load conditions (e.g., pressure/friction), temperature range, medium contact (e.g., oil/acid), and regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA/RoHS). Our engineers can provide free material selection consulting and sample testing.
What is the delivery lead time? Do you offer global logistics?
Standard products: 5–15 working days; custom modifications: 2–4 weeks. We support global air/sea freight and provide export customs clearance documents (including REACH/UL certifications).
Can Bost customize modified plastics with special properties?
Yes! We offer modification services such as reinforcement, flame retardancy, conductivity, wear resistance, and UV resistance, for example:
• Adding carbon fiber to enhance stiffness
• Reducing the coefficient of friction through PTFE modification
• Customizing food-grade or medical-grade certified materials
What are the core advantages of Bost engineering plastics compared to ordinary plastics?
Bost engineering plastics feature ultra-high mechanical strength, high-temperature resistance (-50°C to 300°C), chemical corrosion resistance, and wear resistance. Compared to ordinary plastics, their service life is extended by 3 to 8 times, making them suitable for replacing metals in harsh environments.
You may also like
The plastic plug manufactured by Insert molding with stainless steel plate
The Bost custom PPO flow valve by injection molding
The Bost custom plastic handle by injection molding with high performance PPS material
The Bost custom flow meter by injection molding with PES plastic
Leave a Message
Have any questions or concerns about our products? Please leave us a message here, and our team will get back to you promptly.
© 2025 BOST. All Rights Reserved.
Scan QR Code